Nigerian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Nigerians
Chinese
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,481,390 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 55.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 50.6% | 58.3% |
Range | 48.9% | 57.6% |
Mean | 19.9% | 14.1% |
Median | 18.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 11.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Nigeria (18.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Marshallese (18.4%, a difference of 0.44%), American (18.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Nicaraguan (18.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Bermudans | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.3% |
Fijians | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.3% |
Nicaraguans | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.4% |
Marshallese | 1.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.2 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.4% |
Nigerians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.5% |
Americans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |