Nepalese vs Salvadoran Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Salvadoran
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Salvadorans
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Salvadoran Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,514,690 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,885,602 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.17%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Salvadoran |
Minimum | 0.73% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 19.7% |
Range | 19.2% | 19.3% |
Mean | 7.5% | 7.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Salvadorans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |