Maltese vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Turks
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,419,200 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Turkish |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 96.7% | 66.2% |
| Mean | 25.4% | 20.0% |
| Median | 17.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |