Maltese vs Immigrants from Taiwan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Immigrants from Taiwan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Taiwan
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Taiwan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,419,200 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,913,772 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 11.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Taiwan |
Minimum | 3.3% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 37.2% |
Range | 96.7% | 32.5% |
Mean | 25.4% | 14.7% |
Median | 17.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Taiwan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.77%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Chinese (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 2.8%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |