Malaysian vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from China
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,820,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 22.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 22.2% |
| Range | 25.6% | 21.2% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 7.5% |
| Median | 9.6% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |