Malaysian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Alaskan Athabascans
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,820,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 4.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.81% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 76.9% |
Range | 25.6% | 74.9% |
Mean | 10.6% | 18.8% |
Median | 9.6% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |