Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from China
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,497,176 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.43% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 64.3% | 22.2% |
Range | 63.9% | 21.2% |
Mean | 9.7% | 7.5% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (7.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (7.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Finnish (7.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and European (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Belgium (7.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |