Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,820,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,666,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 4.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Minimum | 0.81% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 27.0% |
Range | 25.6% | 25.8% |
Mean | 10.6% | 9.1% |
Median | 9.6% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |