Malaysian vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Africa
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,820,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,521,718 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Africa |
Minimum | 0.81% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 42.2% |
Range | 25.6% | 40.0% |
Mean | 10.6% | 13.1% |
Median | 9.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |