Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Immigrants from China
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,659,331 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.76% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 22.2% |
Range | 21.5% | 21.2% |
Mean | 6.8% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Asian (7.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Finnish (7.7%, a difference of 0.12%), European (7.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Greece (7.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |