Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chickasaw
13.3%
POVERTY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,719,831 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 10.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.14% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 31.1% | 35.7% |
Range | 30.9% | 34.7% |
Mean | 12.2% | 16.2% |
Median | 10.9% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |