Immigrants from Serbia vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chickasaw
11.1%
POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,733,920 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 32.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 35.7% |
| Range | 25.6% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 16.2% |
| Median | 9.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and Estonian (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Germans | 98.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |