Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Chickasaw
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,384,756 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 38.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.74% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 35.7% |
Range | 16.8% | 34.7% |
Mean | 7.8% | 16.2% |
Median | 8.2% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |