Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Tsimshian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Tsimshian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Tsimshian
13.3%
POVERTY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Tsimshian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,719,831 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.14% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 31.1% | 24.7% |
Range | 30.9% | 17.4% |
Mean | 12.2% | 13.9% |
Median | 10.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Tsimshian by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.82%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.98%), Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |