Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Osage Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Osage
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Osage
13.3%
POVERTY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Osage Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,719,831 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,306 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Osage |
Minimum | 0.14% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 31.1% | 28.9% |
Range | 30.9% | 26.1% |
Mean | 12.2% | 13.8% |
Median | 10.9% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 15.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Osage by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alaskan Athabascan (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Alaska Native (13.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and Marshallese (13.4%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |