Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
15.0%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,178,584 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 33.7% | 35.7% |
Range | 32.7% | 34.7% |
Mean | 15.6% | 16.2% |
Median | 14.7% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Haiti are West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Comanche (15.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Latin America (15.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Barbados (14.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |