Romanian vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Romanians
Chickasaw
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,713,994 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 28.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.31% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 58.5% | 35.7% |
Range | 58.2% | 34.7% |
Mean | 13.5% | 16.2% |
Median | 9.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |