Immigrants from Poland vs Luxembourger Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Luxembourger
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Luxembourgers
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Luxembourger Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,660,101 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 17.8% |
Range | 20.2% | 16.3% |
Mean | 8.8% | 6.7% |
Median | 7.5% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |