English vs Immigrants from South Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
English
Immigrants from South Africa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
English
Immigrants from South Africa
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Immigrants from South Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,761,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,120,116 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.5% |
Range | 97.8% | 58.6% |
Mean | 28.6% | 18.6% |
Median | 17.0% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.5% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to English and Immigrants from South Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (15.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |