English vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
English
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
English
Ute
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,761,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 42.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Ute |
Minimum | 2.2% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.8% | 90.4% |
Mean | 28.6% | 33.1% |
Median | 17.0% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.5% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to English by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |