Costa Rican vs Lebanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Lebanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Lebanese
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Lebanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,241,772 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.78%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Lebanese |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 40.3% |
Range | 42.4% | 38.9% |
Mean | 11.8% | 16.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Lebanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |