Costa Rican vs Samoan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Samoan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Samoans
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Samoan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,052,897 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Samoan |
Minimum | 3.4% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 38.0% |
Range | 42.4% | 35.7% |
Mean | 11.8% | 12.8% |
Median | 11.5% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Samoans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |