Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lebanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Lebanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Lebanese
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lebanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,241,772 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Lebanese |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 40.3% |
Range | 26.1% | 38.9% |
Mean | 11.4% | 16.6% |
Median | 11.4% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lebanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |