Costa Rican vs Mongolian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Mongolian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Mongolians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
53.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Mongolian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,282,925 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Mongolian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 28.4% |
Range | 42.4% | 27.2% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.2% |
Median | 11.5% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Mongolians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |