Costa Rican vs Israeli Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Israeli
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Israelis
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Israeli Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,005,124 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Israeli |
Minimum | 3.4% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 27.1% |
Range | 42.4% | 26.4% |
Mean | 11.8% | 10.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Israelis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |