Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Iraq Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Iraq
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Iraq
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Iraq Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,711,025 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Iraq |
Minimum | 3.4% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 24.3% |
Range | 42.4% | 23.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.5% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Iraq by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |