Costa Rican vs Syrian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Syrian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Syrians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Syrian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,159,377 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Syrian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 45.6% |
Range | 42.4% | 44.7% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Syrians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |