Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Northern Africa
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,660,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.090%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 24.9% | 30.2% |
Range | 23.5% | 28.1% |
Mean | 8.5% | 11.2% |
Median | 8.2% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |