Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Northern Africa
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,083,252 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.18%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 39.8% | 41.8% |
Range | 37.4% | 39.7% |
Mean | 10.8% | 14.8% |
Median | 10.2% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |