Immigrants from Vietnam vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Immigrants from Chile
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Vietnam
Immigrants from Chile
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
75.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,957,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 15.0% |
Range | 44.1% | 14.0% |
Mean | 9.4% | 9.0% |
Median | 9.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Chile by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |