Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from Chile
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from Chile
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 0.54% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 29.9% | 15.0% |
Range | 29.4% | 14.0% |
Mean | 8.8% | 9.0% |
Median | 8.2% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Chile by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |