Bermudan vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Bermudan
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Bermudans
Chickasaw
12.9%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
4.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,508,519 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 27.8% | 40.0% |
Range | 26.3% | 38.3% |
Mean | 12.1% | 14.2% |
Median | 11.5% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Western Asia (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ute (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Seminole (12.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and South American Indian (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Comanche | 7.0 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.8% |
Brazilians | 6.9 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 6.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.8% |
French American Indians | 6.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.9% |
South American Indians | 5.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 5.2 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.9% |
Bermudans | 4.9 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
Ute | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
Seminole | 4.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
Nigerians | 3.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
Chippewa | 2.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Immigrants | Japan | 91.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Syrians | 91.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Jordanians | 90.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 90.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |