Bermudan vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bermudan
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bermudans
Creek
18.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,609,827 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 19.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Creek |
Minimum | 2.4% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 77.8% |
Range | 35.9% | 72.7% |
Mean | 16.2% | 31.3% |
Median | 16.2% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Armenia (18.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cambodia (18.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (18.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |