Australian vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Brazilian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Brazilians
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,523,574 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 8.1% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 58.7% |
| Range | 91.9% | 54.4% |
| Mean | 31.8% | 22.4% |
| Median | 24.7% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Brazilians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |