Immigrants from Chile vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Brazilian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Brazilians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,927,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,523,574 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 0.030%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Brazilian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 58.7% |
Range | 98.2% | 54.4% |
Mean | 25.7% | 22.4% |
Median | 19.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Brazilians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |