Australian vs Northern European Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Northern European
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Northern Europeans
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Northern European Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,261,787 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Northern European |
| Minimum | 8.1% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 57.3% |
| Range | 91.9% | 54.0% |
| Mean | 31.8% | 28.3% |
| Median | 24.7% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 34.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Northern Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |