Australian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,122,689 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 0.010%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Minimum | 8.1% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 52.0% |
Range | 91.9% | 46.9% |
Mean | 31.8% | 19.9% |
Median | 24.7% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |