Australian vs Immigrants from Uganda Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from Uganda
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from Uganda
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from Uganda Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,509,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 0.12%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 8.1% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 66.7% |
Range | 91.9% | 61.2% |
Mean | 31.8% | 22.5% |
Median | 24.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from Uganda by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |