Polish vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Brazilian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Brazilians
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,523,574 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 0.41%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 58.7% |
| Range | 72.7% | 54.4% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 22.4% |
| Median | 18.3% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Brazilians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |