Armenian vs Sri Lankan In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Armenian
Sri Lankan
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Armenians
Sri Lankans
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Sri Lankan In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,746,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Armenians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,177,214 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 72.5% | 61.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.5% | 39.0% |
Mean | 85.1% | 85.0% |
Median | 84.9% | 85.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.7% | 83.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.8% | 86.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Sri Lankans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Australian (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kuwait (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Egypt (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |