Choctaw vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Choctaw
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Choctaw
Chickasaw
81.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,615,470 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 81.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 0.61%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 47.2% | 54.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 52.8% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 78.7% | 80.6% |
| Median | 78.9% | 79.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 72.0% | 73.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.9% | 85.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Shoshone (81.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Yaqui (81.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Arapaho (81.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Alaska Native (81.3%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% |