Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,675,675 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.69%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Nepal	Chickasaw
Minimum	9.9%	6.5%
Maximum	47.7%	62.8%
Range	37.7%	56.3%
Mean	28.7%	27.4%
Median	28.6%	27.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.7%	22.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.1%	30.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.7%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.6%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Iraq (28.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Nigerian (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (28.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (28.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.4%
Nigerians	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.4%
Natives/Alaskans	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.4%
South Americans	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.4%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.4%
Nicaraguans	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.4%
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%