Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Immigrants |
Minimum | 2.8% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 20.4% |
Range | 14.7% | 18.8% |
Mean | 6.5% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |