Immigrants from Poland vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Costa Rican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Costa Ricans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.14%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 9.0% |
| Range | 19.6% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Costa Ricans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |