Immigrants from Peru vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Creek
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,808,215 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 48.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Creek |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 24.7% | 30.8% |
Range | 22.8% | 28.5% |
Mean | 6.2% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.6% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |