Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Immigrants from Belarus
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Immigrants from Belarus
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,808,215 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 24.7% | 19.6% |
| Range | 22.8% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |