Immigrants from Central America vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Creek
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,120,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 35.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Creek |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 30.8% |
Range | 25.2% | 28.5% |
Mean | 6.5% | 12.5% |
Median | 6.2% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |