Immigrants from Lebanon vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Creek
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,147,801 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 46.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Creek |
Minimum | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 15.7% | 30.8% |
Range | 13.6% | 28.5% |
Mean | 6.4% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.6% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |