Immigrants from Colombia vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Colombia
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Colombia
Creek
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Colombia vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 378,592,310 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 44.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Colombia | Creek |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 9.4% | 30.8% |
Range | 7.9% | 28.5% |
Mean | 5.4% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.6% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Colombia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Colombia are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |