Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Creek
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,732,482 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.485 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 46.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Creek |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 30.8% |
Range | 7.1% | 28.5% |
Mean | 5.1% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.4% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |